THE SUBLIME
PART EIGHT
Chapters 28-29 XXVIII
AS to whether or no Periphrasis contributes
to the sublime, no one, I think, will
hesitate.
For just as in music the so-called
accompaniments
bring out the charm of the melody,
so also
periphrasis often harmonises with the
normal
expression and adds greatly to its
beauty,
especially if it has a quality which
is not
inflated and dissonant but pleasantly
tempered.
2. Plato will furnish an instance in
proof
at the opening of his Funeral Oration.
'In
truth they have gained from us their
rightful
tribute, in the enjoyment of which
they proceed
along their destined path, escorted
by their
country publicly, and privately each
by his
kinsmen (Menexenus 236d, at Perseus).'
Death
he calls 'their destined path,' and
the tribute
of accustomed rites he calls 'being
escorted
publicly by their fatherland.' Is it
in a
slight degree only that he has magnified
the conception by the use of these
words?
Has he not rather, starting with unadorned
diction, made it musical, and shed
over it
like a harmony the melodious rhythm
which
comes from periphrasis? 3. And Xenophon
says,
'You regard toil as the guide to a
joyous
life. You have garnered in your souls
the
goodliest of all possessions and the
fittest
for warriors. For you rejoice more
in praise
than in all else (Cyropaideia 1.5.12,
at
Perseus).' In using, instead of 'you
are
willing to toil,' the words 'you deem
toil
the guide to a joyous life,' and in
expanding
the rest of the sentence in like manner,
he has annexed to his eulogy a lofty
idea.
4. And so with that inimitable phrase
of
Herodotus: 'The goddess afflicted those
Scythians
who had pillaged the temple with an
unsexing
malady (Histories 1. 105. 4, at Perseus).'
XXIX A hazardous business, however,
eminently
hazardous is periphrasis, unless it
be handled
with discrimination; otherwise it speedily
falls flat, with its odour of empty
talk
and its swelling amplitude. This is
the reason
why Plato (who is always strong in
figurative
language, and at times unseasonably
so) is
taunted because in his Laws he says
that
'neither gold nor silver treasure should
be allowed to establish itself and
abide
in the city (Laws 801b, at Perseus).'
The
critic says that, if he had been forbidding
the possession of cattle, he would
obviously
have spoken of ovine and bovine treasure.
2. But our parenthetical disquisition
with
regard to the use of figures as bearing
upon
the sublime has run to sufficient length,
dear Terentianus; for all these things
lend
additional passion and animation to
style,
and passion is as intimately allied
with
sublimity as sketches of character
with entertainment.
Chapters 30-32 XXX SINCE, however,
it is
the case that, in discourse, thought
and
diction are for the most part developed
one
through the other, come let us proceed
to
consider any branches of the subject
of diction
which have so far been neglected. Now
it
is, no doubt, superfluous to dilate
to those
who know it well upon the fact that
the choice
of proper and striking words wonderfully
attracts and enthralls the hearer,
and that
such a choice is the leading ambition
of
all orators and writers, since it is
the
direct agency which ensures the presence
in writings, as upon the fairest statues,
of the perfection of grandeur, beauty,
mellowness,
dignity, force, power, and any other
high
qualities there may be, and breathes
into
dead things a kind of living voice.
All this
it is, I say, needless to mention,
for beautiful
words are in very truth the peculiar
light
of thought. 2. It may, however, be
pointed
out that stately language is not to
be used
everywhere, since to invest petty affairs
with great and high- sounding names
would
seem just like putting a full-sized
tragic
mask upon an infant boy. But in poetry
and......
XXXI ...... full of vigour and racy;
and
so is Anacreon's line,
'That Thracian mare no longer do I
heed.'
In this way, too, that original expression
of Theopompus merits praise. Owing
to the
correspondence between word and thing
it
seems to me to be highly expressive;
and
yet Caecilius for some unexplained
reason
finds fault with it. 'Philip,' says
Theopompus,
'had a genius for stomaching things.'
Now
a homely expression of this kind is
sometimes
much more telling than elegant language,
for it is understood at once since
it is
drawn from common life, and the fact
that
it is familiar makes it only the more
convincing.
So the words 'stomaching things' are
used
most strikingly of a man who, for the
sake
of attaining his own ends, patiently
and
with cheerfulness endures things shameful
and vile. 2. So with the words of Herodotus.
'Cleomenes,' he says, 'went mad, and
with
a small sword cut the flesh of his
own body
into strips, until he slew himself
by making
mincemeat of his entire person (Herodotus,
Histories 6. 75, at Perseus).' And,
'Pythes
fought on shipboard, until he was utterly
hacked to pieces (Herodotus, Histories
7.
181, at Perseus).' These phrases graze
the
very edge of vulgarity, but they are
saved
from vulgarity by their expressiveness.
XXXII Further, with regard to the number
of metaphors to be employed, Caecilius
seems
to assent to the view of those who
lay it
down that not more than two, or at
the most
three, should be ranged together in
the same
passage. Demosthenes is, in fact, the
standard
in this as in other matters. The proper
time
for using metaphors is when the passions
roll like a torrent and sweep a multitude
of them down their resistless flood.
2. 'Men,'
says he, 'who are vile flatterers,
who have
maimed their own fatherlands each one
of
them, who have toasted away their liberty
first to Philip and now to Alexander,
who
measure happiness by their belly and
their
lowest desires, and who have overthrown
that
liberty and that freedom from despotic
mastery
which to the Greeks of an earlier time
were
the rules and standards of good' (Demosthenes,
On the Crown,
296, at Perseus). Here the orator's
wrath
against the traitors throws a veil
over the
number of the tropes. 3. In the same
spirit,
Aristotle and Theophrastus point out
that
the following phrases serve to soften
bold
metaphors--'as if,' and 'as it were,'
and
'if one may so say,' and 'if one may
venture
such an expression'; for the qualifying
words
mitigate, they say, the audacity of
expression.
4. I accept that view, but still for
number
and boldness of metaphors I maintain,
as
I said in dealing with figures, that
strong
and timely passion and noble sublimity
are
the appropriate palliatives. For it
is the
nature of the passions, in their vehement
rush, to sweep and thrust everything
before
them, or rather to demand hazardous
turns
as altogether indispensable. They do
not
allow the hearer leisure to criticise
the
number of the metaphors because he
is carried
away by the fervour of the speaker.
5. Moreover,
in the treatment of commonplaces and
in descriptions
there is nothing so impressive as a
number
of tropes following close one upon
the other.
It is by this means that in Xenophon
the
anatomy of the human tabernacle is
magnificently
depicted, and still more divinely in
Plato.
Plato says that its head is a citadel;
in
the midst, between the head and the
breast,
is built the neck like some isthmus.
The
vertebrae, he says, are fixed beneath
like
pivots. Pleasure is a bait which tempts
men
to ill, the tongue the test of taste;
the
heart is the knot of the veins and
the wellspring
of the blood that courses round impetuously,
and it is stationed in the guard-house
of
the body. The passages by which the
blood
races this way and that he names alleys.
He says that the gods, contriving succour
for the beating of the heart
(which takes place when dangers are
expected,
and when wrath excites it, since it
then
reaches a fiery heat), have implanted
the
lungs, which are soft and bloodless
and have
pores within, to serve as a buffer,
in order
that the heart may, when its inward
wrath
boils over, beat against a yielding
substance
and so escape injury. The seat of the
desires
he compared to the women's apartments
in
a house, that of anger to the men's.
The
spleen he called the napkin of the
inward
parts, whence it is filled with secretions
and grows to a great and festering
bulk.
After this, the gods canopied the whole
with
flesh, putting forward the flesh as
a defence
against injuries from without, as though
it were a hair-cushion. The blood he
called
the fodder of the flesh. 'In order
to promote
nutrition,' he continues, ' they irrigated
the body, cutting conduits as in gardens,
in order that, with the body forming
a set
of tiny channels, the streams of the
veins
might flow as from a never-failing
source.'
When the end comes, he says that the
cables
of the soul are loosed like those of
a ship,
and she is allowed to go free (Plato,
Timaeus
65c-85e, at Perseus). 6. Examples of
a similar
nature are to be found in a never-ending
series. But those indicated are enough
to
show that figurative language possesses
great
natural power, and that metaphors contribute
to the sublime; and at the same time
that
it is impassioned and descriptive passages
which rejoice in them to the greatest
extent.
7. It is obvious, however, even though
I
do not dwell upon it, that the use
of tropes,
like all other beauties of expression,
is
apt to lead to excess. On this score
Plato
himself is much criticised, since he
is often
carried away by a sort of frenzy of
words
into strong and harsh metaphors and
into
inflated allegory. 'For it is not readily
observed,' he says, 'that a city ought
to
be mixed like a bowl, in which the
mad wine
seethes when it has been poured in,
though
when chastened by another god who is
sober,
falling thus into noble company, it
makes
a good and temperate drink'
(Plato, Laws 773c, at Perseus). For
to call
water 'a sober god,' and mixing 'chastening,'
is--the critics say--the language of
a poet,
and one who is in truth far from sober.
8.
Fastening upon such defects, however,
Caecilius
ventured, in his writings in praise
of Lysias,
to make the assertion that Lysias was
altogether
superior to Plato. In so doing he gave
way
to two blind impulses of passion. Loving
Lysias better even than himself, he
nevertheless
hates Plato more perfectly than he
loves
Lysias. In fact, he is carried away
by the
spirit of contention, and even his
premisses
are not, as he thought, admitted. For
he
prefers the orator as faultless and
immaculate
to Plato as one who has often made
mistakes.
But the truth is not of this nature,
nor
anything like it.
|